Group of Thought: Doctor Reza Ramazani Sunshine A member of the Iranian Systems Science Association and the Amirkabir University of Technology’s faculty, in his essay published in his channel, about the Israeli 6 -day invasion of Iran, which emphasized with the support of the US and NATO, deals with the fact that this bitter event has unexpectedly led to Iran’s national solidarity. He views this unity as a promising opportunity to revise the state of the country and governance. The author argues that despite the many problems by actors and scholars, the solution lies in focusing on key issues (such as “Golden Number”) and rebuilding public confidence in governance.
He believes that the Iranian governance system has been “aging” and its most important pest is the distrust of the people, which is rooted in inefficiency, corruption, and especially the system of appointments that use people without merit and relations. For “self -esteem” and trusting, Ramadan suggests that governance should take a fundamental review of the appointment process of its managers and experts, and this great responsibility requires the will and wills of the unrest. It deals with “self -esteem” and confidence. In the field of self -esteem, he believes that taking this great step requires the desire and unified support of the system of governance. This article reads:
****
1- The 2-day rape was very bitter and passionate. Iran was confronted with a heavy offensive with the overt defense and weapons support of the US and NATO government. An unequal confrontation that went beyond a military attack. The danger of damaging the country’s integrity was ambushed. Of course, this danger has not yet been resolved, and we are practically in the state of war.
Among those suffering and pain, wonders were experienced. In the rotations of the gems, it was revealed (in the cheat of the science of the science of Jewel). The supporters of the supporters of Iran and the accomplices of Aniran became more intertwined. The unparalleled synergy in defending Iran’s integrity became a common chapter between the colorful spectrum of sovereignty and supporters of governance on the one hand to enlightening, activists, opposition scholars on the other. Everyone in the “O Iran” jointly remembered the homeland. The seeds of hope for another Iranian, superior and flourishing in the hearts. It turned out that national interests could be the focus of solidarity. This promising breeze brought fresh air in the pre -6 -day rape.
2- National solidarity was not enough to defend the homeland, exceeding non-reflections:
Actors in various political, economic, social, and cultural fields have had an opportunity to remind the survivors of years and decades. The spectrum of problems is different; Its range, from the country’s macro problems to the problems of the lines, areas, provinces and cities, as well as sectors, organizations and institutions.
Many of these problems are to mention repeated calamity and, of course, by wishing them to resolve them in the new hopeful space. These are necessary to say that the problems are not forgotten, but many of these problems arise from a tangible and integrated network of problems and causes. A case -oriented approach may relieve them, but it does not cure. Here I do not mention the field problems with which the pains are dealing with, such as poverty, unemployment, expensive, inattention. Because it is assumed that actors are the voices of deprivation.
The scholars also had the opportunity to guide; To say about the weaknesses of the governance and the threats to ambush; Show opportunities by mentioning the strengths. A dramatic set of valuable letters and statements is exported to Iran and the people. In these statements, a large list of national, sector, regional, specialized and technical demands is presented. Some statements are demanded by the sovereignty in addition to the two small and large problems – and mostly in place. The cumulative list of problems will undoubtedly reach hundreds. These statements and letters are reminiscent of Hamid Sadegh’s poem: “What I see I don’t want, what I want to see.”
1- Fundamental asking: What are the actors and scholars expecting a wide range of problems in the country? Are they looking to enlighten the problems of the current situation with a set of problems? Or there are problems that are not forgotten? If they expect to resolve problems by mentioning a lot of problems and accumulation of solutions, will it be resolved?
4- Years ago a guidance was conducted at Harvard University And the result was that if a subject is raised by more than 5 criteria or ID- the subject is raised, the subject would be in a halo, inability to communicate conceptual, data and information, and finally, inability to make decisions and implementation.
It was so that they called the “golden number”. That is, if there are hundreds of demands, even about 2 or less of a large desire of integration, categorization, and raise. Now that it is the issue of governance and resolving the country’s problems, it is both complicated and very sensitive. Hundreds of demands can be made, “hundreds” itself becomes an imperfect “. Interestingly, hundreds of suggested solutions also have a colorful spectrum, from “Bake-Simple” to “structural change of system” and this has a problem.
It can be said that the big shortage of the long list of desires is the lack of attention to their may/. In addition to the macro -scale characteristic of the subject of governance, the current situation should also be included. The danger of the evil shadow of war has not yet been removed from the country and the people. Is the demand of fundamental structural transformation in the war situation with all the relevant considerations and requirements, and is it possible to consult with the national interests?
Evidence can be seen with much evidence that this desire is ideal at the present time, neither in the interests of national interests nor feasible. That is to say, defending the foreign enemy in a state of war is overwhelmed by claims, disputes, and even intra -national conflict.
These are household fights and it must be resolved in place, because if Iran is not present, it will not be. Really, if the missile and solidarity were not national, it would not have been clear how much we would have experienced the Gaza disaster with the enemy’s human being. It was a glorious that we had air defense to experience the glory of territorial defense, and we were a source of fear and death in the lives. It was said to remember the current dangerous situation. Of course, it is reasonable to ask in this situation:
Now that the national defense and solidarity are the two tools to guarantee the territorial integrity and deterrence of the enemy, where is the boundary of the desires to be impaired? Will the government rule the same past? If the past was a guidance, the list of micro and macro problems would not have reached thousands. To answer these questions, the fundamentals of integration are needed, otherwise we will be caught in the field of coherent, contradictory, contradictory and contradictory wishes, words and writings, and problems will not be resolved.
1- The other is on the sides of the governance; It is pretended that the long -standing actors, scholars, and opponents of the old critic have changed in five days and have become supporters of governance over the past tradition. I hope that the Sadr of rule, the government and the senior executives of the system will not be hidden.
Theoretically, processes, as well as organizations, systems, mechanical, biological, social systems are old as the transformation of the context and the time. The fact is that both the process of the revolution and the Iranian governance system has become old in terms of scientific evidence. It may be bitter for many. Knowing the bitterness of reality and the solution of it is superior to the sweetness of the illusions and the latest suffering. To prevent the death of organizations and systems, it needs autopoiesis.
It may be argued that the system of governance in Iran has the ability to self-control- that is, gradually youth. It seems that governance in Iran is still capable of self -writing if there is a will, the will of transformation, and the acceptance of scientific, specialized and technical methods. The existence of many mentioning in statements, letters, and guidelines implicitly illustrates the possibility and hope of self -sacrifice in Iran.
2. Grouping is a long process And interacts with a systemic approach; Another opportunity to be addressed. By observing the principle of the Golden Number and the category of the dynasty and utilizing systemic theories, one can take a step towards self -governing in Iran as follows:
– What is the biggest general characteristic of all the problems of the country? Starnest can be shown that people’s mistrust is governance, an example of distrust of efficiency, mistrust of the ability, distrust of the righteousness, distrust of poverty alleviation, mistrust of corruption, and trust in the health of a large part of bureaucracy. The list of these is a lot. In order to enjoy national support, repel and disappoint the invaders, governance has an urgent need for national trust.
Confidence It is also a long process that is one of the subordinates of governing governance in Iran. Drivation is mainly rooted in inefficiency, inability and corruption. Much of the people, as a result of mistrust, do not consider governance. Why?
The individuals or groups in the governance in Iran are determined in three ways “selection”, “appointment” and “appointment”. Much of the technical and specialized institutions in the body of governance are selected or selected directly by the public. If they are selected, they can be removed. Unfortunately, the performance of the “appointed” and “appointments” is not the case.
A person has been installed on a state or national institution for decades. In addition to its incompetence, with the ethnicity, the comrade of the game, the obedience, the insanity, the chain of installation. In a country where the government is about 2 percent of the penetrating economy, the pests of the initial appointment and the chain of the later autonomy can be obtained. It has been so that over time they gradually see their people apart from many appointments, especially because despite the inability and inefficiency of the appointed, people do not have the ability and hope to dismiss them; The shortcomings and bodies of the appointed from the top to the following are governing. The increase in people’s distance has been expensive for decades.
A prominent example is in the national media, which has been in the hands of the appointments who have never been beaten by the people. Ranked from national media is a national disaster. In the current crisis of war, the pests of the appointment become more evident.
The national media, without accountability to the people, takes the positions of war and the government’s official policy and official policy. The discussion of appointment pests in Iranian governance is not limited to government media. Many of the appointed in government positions, not in terms of meritocracy, but in the ways mentioned earlier, burn national opportunities and waste national resources; The justification of those positions is purely in terms of appointment.
1- Proposal: Governance for confidence, as a step for self-esteem- as an attempt to rejuvenate governance- in the process and structure of appointment of appointments in its management, expert and executive position. The number of appointments reaches thousands at different levels of the system and in the position of managing the country’s resources and materials. In this revision, use the people, actors, fair, pure and advocates of national interests. For trust, it is necessary to trust people.
It is clear that such a revision is a difficult decision. This is not possible except with the will, will, and support of the unauthorized governance, that is, the presidents of the triple forces can not handle such an important important. However, in order to gradually evolve to rule and self -esteem, one must take a steep step and take a major surgeries in the way of meritocracy and the preservation of national interests. This is a long step, if it is not taken today, it will be too late tomorrow.
Summary of the Word;
– At this point of view of Iranian history, the governance of the self -sacrifice will not miss the opportunity.
– People’s distrust of the great national pest governance. Governance strives to create trust.
– Immediate and emergency revision of managerial, expert and executive appointments in governance- such as the media- and even as much as possible to select conventional appointments to the choice of people, actors and scholars will be a great step towards trust and self-esteem.
* Reza Ramezani Khorshidoust Association of Iranian Systems Science and Amir Kabir University of Technology
1
منبع: www.khabaronline.ir
