Thought group: The extremists are tearing apart the Iranian society. If the political system thinks about its survival, i.e. maintaining the system, according to the jurisprudence of interest, it has no choice but to enter the stage of serious confrontation with this force. Social resilience is a thread. And they think about their sect and the future of their sect. According to the news agency Online news quoted from JamaranAbout the coordinates of this situation, Dr. Kyomarth Ashtarian, Professor of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of Tehran University In the review meeting “National participation and reconstruction of the government’s capacityHe has lectured at the Institute of Religious and Economic Studies. On the one hand, he talks about the danger of the formation of an ideological bourgeoisie and the deepening and intensification of sectarianism, and on the other hand, about the lighting of the flames and threats of territorial divergence. Here are the words of this university professor:
***
We are in danger
According to Jamaran, Dr. Kyomarth Ashtarian, a professor at the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of Tehran University In the review meeting “National participation and reconstruction of the government’s capacityHe was speaking at the Institute of Religious and Economic Studies, stating that “the necessity of national participation is one of the obvious things that unfortunately we do not pay attention to, and here the obviousness has become its veil”, he stated: “Now our country is in a situation It is very sensitive and we are exposed to dangers from countries like Israel, America and other enemies. In the face of threats, it is always argued that we should have deterrence, but when it comes to deterrence, unfortunately, most minds and actions go towards military deterrence.
We must be able to restore and revive various capitals in the country
Emphasizing on the “deterrent role of the country’s military and defense power”, he said: “It should be noted that there are other dimensions that have deterrent power.” We must be able to restore and revive various capitals in this country; including government capacity and economic and human capital. One of the most important elements that strengthen deterrence is national power and national human capital. You can’t give the administration of the country’s cultural affairs to a minority and feel that you have invited different cultures and ethnic groups to participate. You cannot monopolize a large part of the space of economic activities and then talk about economic participation.”
We have deprived the country and the government of national human capital
This university professor stated that “national human capital can act as the most important national deterrent”, and continued: “Unfortunately, we do not have a clear strategy for the development of human resources in the country, and in the first way, a clear strategy for the development of human resources in We do not have inside the government. The main negligence we did was that we emptied the country and the government of national human capital. Usually, when it comes to the use of human resources and the expansion and development of human resources, we have a political view and think that we should attract active groups and factions to participate, this idea is definitely correct, but our negligence was there Apart from the known political forces, we did not use the country’s national manpower. There is such a procedure from selection in recruitment to higher management levels.
A “superior cultural self” is everywhere
Ashtarian stated that a few years ago I wrote an article entitled “Cultural racism in government recruitment”, which was a reference to the policies that some institutions had in the previous government in accepting and selecting human resources, he added: “In In the previous government, these institutions invited certain people and circles to be employed in the lowest circles, although these dear ones obviously think that they are not racists. But their action in selection and recruitment is a form of cultural racism. There is a “Cultural Higher Self” that dominates employment, politics, culture, economics, and the media everywhere. Its disadvantage is that the administration falls into a small circle and the national knowledge reserve is not formed here in which everyone is involved in the work and administrative activities of the government. A small group remains that has a certain time capacity and a small talent capacity.
In government, it is not easy to transfer expert opinion from the bottom up
He emphasized that “national manpower becomes a capital if you can have a strategy, and based on that, the forces that you feel are worthy and capable, enter the decision cycle, can show themselves and the capacity of the government. to the extent that it can bring these worthy forces into the decision-making cycle”, he explained: “We created the primary obstacle that National forces, whether political factions or otherwise, basically cannot enter decision-making cycles. In addition, within the government cycle, it is not easy to transfer expert opinion from the bottom up. “General choice” theory, which is a subset of “rational choice theory”, discusses and examines this situation well.
This faculty member of Tehran University said:The theory of “public choice” in explaining the reason for the ineffectiveness of governments says that a cycle of benefits and satisfaction is formed from the point of view of subordinates. That person is a subordinate, he wants to be promoted, and his superiors also want to hear good words and see everything positively and act in the direction of their interests. This vicious cycle is formed and makes the governance system depreciated, empty and destroyed. A bachelor’s letter does not easily reach higher cycles. In Iran, in most governments, expert opinion is not easily transferred from the bottom to the top. “The higher you go, the more difficult this transition becomes, and self-censorship is formed.”
Ashtarian continued: “Kissinger says in his memoirs that our problem with the Soviets was that the way they rose up in the decision-making cycle and gained position was different from the way we rose up. I don’t want to talk about its right and wrong, I only evaluate the content. He says that they came up in a bloody cycle and they definitely remove and destroy the other, but in the West or America, there are exchanges that this removal is less. What he means is that you behave in the same way as you rise in the decision-making system.
Gradually, intellectually, we fall into a kind of sectarianism
He stated that “in our decision-making system, people must go through a series of relaxations, relaxations and eases in the decision-making cycle in order to find the ability to reach a higher position”, he added:There are definitely exceptions, but the general picture is like this. The less expert opinion is given and the less you enter into fights and the less you are hassle-free and the less freedom of action and authority you have, the easier it is to enter the upper cycles. As a result, we gradually become intellectually sectarian. The higher you go, the more important this pathology is. As a result, the thoughts of a large part of our human power cannot enter the upper layers. Of course, this situation is not specific to our country, and more or less, other countries may also be involved in it.”
Dr. Kyomarth Ashtarian, professor of law and political science faculty of Tehran University
Freedom as science and knowledge and the basic strengthening of the expert system
Ashtarian, while examining the definitions of freedom, stated that “freedom as a political concept has been talked about a lot, but freedom as science and knowledge and the basic reinforcement of the expert system has been discussed less”, and reminded: “Expert freedom is based on the idea that science , is nothing but expert free processes and expert dialogues. The set that we call science or knowledge in policy-making and decision-making is a set of contracts that are tested and formed among thinkers and experts, so decision-making knowledge, which is the basic capacity of the government, is a construct. Social within government undergraduate groups. To what extent there is expert freedom within our administrative system, I leave it to everyone’s judgment, but I am only talking about its necessity.“
We must commit ourselves to speak freely and have an expert dialogue with each other
This university professor noted: “Basically, freedom, like a path, is a meaningful concept; It is not that you determine its criteria in advance, but we should all commit ourselves to speak freely and have an expert dialogue. Therefore, as much as we can advance this capacity of national human resources with this view and the political system has this self-awareness that it looks at it as a vital necessity and basic capacity and not as a threat, this freedom can be to show the freedom of expert debates within the government and the freedom of managers of their country in the selection of personnel. Freedom is in the capacity of the government as a deterrent.
It should be returned to national capital
Ashtarian stated that “human resources should be considered as an important tool of national capital and national participation in the economic field is also very important”, he clarified: “Sanctions have gripped this country, whatever government is at work, We are currently involved in sanctions and severe economic pressures. The strategy of the American and Israeli governments is to take the last traces of this country and weaken it until it becomes numb. For deterrence to counter this “strategy of Ramq”, it is necessary to return to the national funds. One of the dimensions of economy is national capital and national capitalist system. One of the areas we need to strengthen is something called “national capitalism”. It is not possible to produce capitalists, this will intensify the rentier economy and what exists now. Therefore, we must think of measures so that national capitalism and national capitalists are seen as an institution for the development of the country“
He said: “Not only did we not do this, but we are constantly working to destroy national capitalism. Even if power is formed through this virtual space economy, Every group that gains power, certain institutions take a percentage of their shares by putting pressure on them. Therefore, if we want national capitalism, we must have an institutional approach to it, and with various means and government intervention, we must provide the ground for its growth to develop one of the pillars of national development.
The ground has been prepared for the formation of the ideological bourgeoisie
This faculty member of Tehran University added: “For political and other reasons, it seems unfortunate The ground has been prepared for the formation of an ideological bourgeois class, this problem has various aspects, but its main form is political ideology and less religious, and religious tendencies help it in terms of creating an army and recruiting troops.. This is a point of damage for us that we must pay attention to. This ideological bourgeoisie advances its mechanisms and strengthens its special forces. It produces its own low-level fighters and even intensifies the atmosphere of war and promotes reconciliation. It has certain political symbols and In a paradoxical way, it is fed by a social left protesting against the global system. We see its signs. We are witnessing a strange combination of this economic left and right class, which we call the oil bourgeoisie. This is the most important damage that we are witnessing now.»
We are creating a closed central loop in culture, politics and economy
According to Ashtarian, “a strange divergence and eccentricity has been created in different fields in Iran. We are creating a closed central loop in culture, politics, and economics that exacerbates divergence, and this is our most critical point of harm. The enemies are paying attention to this point and are waiting to light the sparks of social fire and territorial divergence. In fact, they witness this extreme divergence and seek to use it. These very dangerous threats have engulfed the country. If we want to have real deterrence, we must return to national participation in manpower, political forces, culture, media. We left the media in the hands of the ignorant minority of the world, who have closed their minds and thoughts against all social forces. We must reconsider these policies.”
216216
منبع: www.khabaronline.ir
