Group of Thought: In the section of thought Online News An article by Vahid Islamzadeh, with headlines Britain needed to overthrow Mossadegh for its own development and post -war Europe Published. Following that doctor Fereydoon Majlis Reacted in a short story. In that short, he emphasized that Mossadegh’s oil -free economy policy led to Iran’s economic bankruptcy … and was essentially Amini who rescued the country’s consortium from the crisis by signing a consortium. About Dr. Majlis Criticism Hamid Reza AbedianThe researcher in the field of contemporary history responded to Dr. Majlesi’s criticism. In his article, Abedian attempted to criticize Dr. Majlesi’s article from the perspective of political philosophy on the issue of how national interests are preserved in international contracts such as consortium, especially in unequal power. From this point of view, the issue of the impact of the coup d’état on August 28, 1332 and foreign interference on the fate of the Iranian nation responded to Iran’s underdeveloped factors with foreign interference and internal tyranny.
But what you read below is Dr. Fereydoon Majlesi’s response to Hamid Reza Abedian. From the point of view of political philosophy, the parliamentary default is based on national interests and governance based on expertise and awareness of domestic and international affairs. He believes that Mossadegh’s unrealistic policies have hit Iran’s national interests. Also, unrealistic policies also deprived him of coherent foreign policy regulation, and it was a faithful that he was able to sign a successful contract, relying on his knowledge and experience, relying on his knowledge and experience. From this perspective, the parliament considers the focus on practical results. Majlesi believes that Mossadegh closed the oil industry with the idea of the West’s reliance on Iranian oil and hit the country’s economy and development. He emphasized that the West was able to endure the closure by replacing Iran’s oil from other sources. But instead, the Iranian Consortium has expanded to the highest acceleration. Majlesi believes that Iran and the West needed each other at the time, and that the mutual reliance on the West was a logical choice for Iran. He points out that Iran was unable to manage the oil industry at the time and needed cooperation with foreign companies. In the background of the Majlis mind, the issue of Iran’s development and development can be seen well. With the experience of the national movement, he wants to inform the Iranian political system to the facts that he considers to be evil. The following is an analytical article:
****
News Online, with respect
A few days ago on the occasion of the historical period related to the late Mossadegh, an article was written by Mr. Vahid Islamzadeh, which I said in a brief summary as follows. Online News “Contrary to Mossadegh’s illusion about the West’s reliance on Iranian oil, the West easily endured the closure of the Iranian oil industry for five years, and Mossadegh prefers the oil industry closure to an agreement to exploit it, and adopted the country’s” oil -free economy “policy to obtain bankruptcy and bankruptcy. The production of competitors was developed and replaced! “Amini rescued the country by signing a consortium.”
Because I saw an online news release from Mr. Hamid Reza Abedian On the short material, Fereydoon Majlesi has written to prove Mossadegh’s legitimacy on a variety of issues that I do not find some of its points with my short story. I needed to use my right to respond and say: Like most Iranians at the time, I confirm and support the fact that Mossadegh recognized and supported the Iranian and Iranian oil contract unjustly and led it nationalization. But I do not consider Mr. Abedian’s detailed criticism of Mr. Abedian’s detailed criticism of the “short material”:
2. Do I mention Mossadegh’s illusion about the West’s reliance on Iranian oil? Not that? Didn’t they consider such a need for their bargaining? Didn’t the West prove that it had sufficient alternatives to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Iraq?
1- Didn’t Iranian oil be closed from June to July 6 for three years until the system re-launched the system for three years, and this did not indicate the presence of other competitors and the West’s tolerance?
2. Did the World Bank’s temporary management proposal not to clarify the claims of the British-Iranian Oil Company, which guaranteed Iran’s continued work and benefits from the closure of its closure?
4- Didn’t the signature of the latest joint British and US joint proposal, which Mr. Abedian consider better than the consortium contract, did not take advantage of the next issues and was not for Iran’s benefit?
5. Didn’t Mossadegh prefer the closure of the Iranian oil industry and the adoption of a “oil-free economy” policy?
6. Wasn’t the deprivation of Iran to the only source of currency education and its income and the country’s “economy” in bankruptcy and the need to publish banknotes? Didn’t Zahedi’s empty treasury?
7. Didn’t competitors have been strengthened and replaced by Iran during Iran’s retreat from the oil market?
8. Didn’t Kardan and his colleagues reach an agreement during the four months of negotiations, during which Iran achieved the highest acceleration of development and Iran benefited from it?
In fact, Mr. Abedian’s flaws are a closed case that has successfully completed his duties, profits and profits, and no mutual suggestions were against it.
My critical content was in response to the writer who wrote “Britain needed to overthrow Mossadegh for its development and Europe after the war.”Well, in the post -war world, it was only the West and to the extent Japan that needed energy sources in the Middle East, including Iranian oil. In addition, Iran and the backward countries of the Middle East also needed money and technology only their customers, the West and Japan! Was there another customer ???
Mr. Abedian, at the beginning of the US ambassador’s Henderson report, cited the Iranians that “oil production and treatment is in charge of the consortium, not Iran”, assuming that the ambassador did not show off in the report, unless the Iranians themselves knew that they could not produce oil production and treatment! If they could have been able to do the job in Mossadegh’s time! If they could not go to the contractor at all!
They have pointed to the unequal conditions of power in arranging the contract, which is not clear. That is to say, Iran should not negotiate and was responsible for the consequences of August 6th to those who created that deadlock and had no effect on the influence of foreigners in Iran, and of course Iran had just been in the West’s separatist occupation. Did the aliens want to become the poor country of Asia and Africa after Japan?
US Ambassador to Iran Mohammad Mossadegh and Henderson
You may know that under Darcy’s contract, which was renewed in year 2, Iran had no share in the Iranian -British oil company and only earned a 2 % net profit for the score of Mozaffar al -Din Shah, which was adjusted to 2 % and a owner right. In the year of the signing of Darcy’s contract, the late Mossadegh Mostofi was in Khorasan and no objections were seen, but he may have felt the problem of nationalization. The consortium contract had no conflict with the nationalization of the Iranian oil industry, only facilitated its implementation, and it was completed five years later and delivered to Iran and went! Maybe you wanted to negotiate it, like the Brjam, and the oil is closed and no somewhere!
The consortium has taken the exam and has been completed and its results can be examined “after surgery”. It is like a surgery that has been performed 5 years ago and has been treated for a long time. And still the opponents of the surgeon believe in another hypothetical practice that the operation was done 5 years ago and that the type of action may have been better! Without the other type of action or not needed it. The country and its plan from the implementation of that contract made Iran the richest country in Asia and Africa from Japan! Iran converted the conventional and imposed share of the world market at that time, which, between the owner and the contractor, subsequently converted to 4-5.
Perhaps Mr. Abedian and many others have forgotten that the largest refinery in the world and the oil cities of Abadan and Masjed Suleiman and the drilling rigs and pipelines had not been made by Iran and the confiscation of the Iranian -British oil company could be resolved by war. The Majlis sees the Iranian oil industry’s six -year closure as a result of Mossadegh’s fear of signing a balanced exploitation contract, especially the refusal to accept the World Bank’s temporary tenure. Unlike Mr. Abedini, a parliament never “boycott”! Iran’s oil sales have not pointed out because it knows that Iranian oil sales were not boycotted! Because: First, with the closure of the Iranian oil industry, due to the lack of experts and internal facilities, there was no except for a distillation tower and Kermanshah for domestic oil use.
The small cargo of waste collection was to be banned. Secondly, the British court had banned the ban on selling non -property due to the confiscation of the British and Iranian oil company. The ban is other than sanctions! The National Iranian Oil Company, with the support of the formation of OPEC and the general secretary of Rouhani, led the oil price increase. A country where the engineer and technical and financial facilities did not have a closed oil industry administration had the opportunity to deliver all assets, refineries and facilities five years earlier than the 5 -year deadline, and took over the technical and management positions. The National Iranian Oil Company has become the richest oil company in the Middle East, and Iran became the richest country in Asia and Africa after Japan.
Mossadegh’s government wanted to continue the economy without oil for a few years? The issue of the dictatorship that has been mentioned is not a matter of cultural and social development and has nothing to do with the consortium! The Shah did not interfere in the executive at the beginning. Of course, Mossadegh’s experience gradually dictated him, and in addition to the constitution, he was also responsible for overseeing foreign relations and oil policy, and the Supreme Economic Council was held. Good and bad also have nothing to do with the consortium.
The Iranian Constitutional Constitution was a transformation of tyranny and lawlessness to the rule of law and the provision of democratic infrastructure for post -political and social maturity. In general, only Iran, Turkey, Japan, and Egypt had a constitution, and all the Asian and African countries were in accordance with the dictatorship of the time! Mossadegh was also far from the closure of the Senate, taking over the commander of the armed forces, the dissolution of the country’s court, taking the legislative individual powers, and eventually the closure of the National Assembly. According to the constitution of the Prime Minister, the prime minister has no executive powers! See the law! Yes, after August 6, the 17th and void assembly was dissolved, and the Majlis was formed with the supervision of the Communist influence, which has nothing to do with the consortium.
If the previous offer to Mossadegh was better, it would have to sign !!! Amini himself says that unfortunately the contract was better lost! It was not important to understand or not understand the government’s consortium in Zahedi’s consistency. Amini had done his best expert in Iran, with extra survey led to the bounty of the ministers and the delegates and the prolongation of the work. In a situation where the delay was to the detriment of Iran every day. The best thing was “you don’t understand”. In practice, Iran was completely benefited and prevented further loss. Reza Shah’s reform contract was prolonged to the contract, which was limited to five years in the Amini Contracting Talks. Another issue was the loss of five years of closure of the British and Iranian Oil Company, which was resolved in the overall understanding of the Gramat !!!
Read more:
Britain needed to overthrow Mossadegh / Ethical corruption of the British government by Professor Gidel for its development and Europe after the war.
Fereydoon Majlesi: Mossadegh led Iran to bankrupt
US Ambassador: To the Iranians, we understand that oil production and treatment is in the Consortium, not Iran / Shah and Zahedi’s order to approve the consortium contract by parliament and government
216216
منبع: www.khabaronline.ir
