Thought group: Why the president of the doctors for State administration, usThe 9th, 10th and 13th presidents don’t say “we can”, but instead use scientific literature “we will do our best”? How do these two sentences show themselves in development? Can we relate to something idealistic and epic and do all our efforts to relate to everyday life? We can, it arises from absolutist reason, and we do our best, from critical reason? These are the questions that Vahid Islamzadeh addresses in his article, and by creating a generational distinction, he emphasizes that generation Z moves on the line of “we will do our best”, for this reason, history has a lesson for him, but For the previous generations, they move on the line that we can, because they win in any case and defeat is not an option for them, so history loses its lesson meaning for them. Check out this article below:
***
Since we Iranians are very capable of saying epic words, that’s why we can easily say “we can”; And saying “we can’t” is considered a kind of failure.
Some people are just words and you can’t expect more from them. For example, they say “we can” but in practice they say “we can’t”. But they don’t admit failure either. In the end, we didn’t understand that we Iranians really “can” or “can’t”? If “we can”, then where do the many and various problems and ambiguities that we have in political, social, cultural, economic and environmental affairs come from? If “we can’t” then why do we use words like being able and power and mastery; Are we a nation that “likes” to lie to ourselves? Are we a nation that “likes” to deceive ourselves? Are we a nation that “likes” to live in illusion?!
Applying critical thinking
My point of view in this article is rational-critical. In what sense: First, it is rational because I have arranged its puzzles only based on “logic”; It is critical: because whatever is rational and logical must also be critical. What is the logic? When a part of all the pieces of the puzzle are aligned with each other and the other part contradicts each other at the same time, but the main condition of all the pieces is that they complement each other, it is called “logic”.
Why is the focus of our point of view rational-critical? Because everything that can be doubted can be investigated and criticized, and everything that can be criticized is rational-logical. This is the secret of movement and progress. We define rationality and logic in doubt. When we doubt anything, then we have a rational-critical view of it because we want to know it first and correct it second. The rational-critical view is a hierarchical view. First, one should doubt everything; Second, clear the mind of everything that causes a positive view of that matter; Third, the previous structure must be collapsed and disintegrated. Fourth, the structure and organization must be arranged from the beginning. The rational-critical view is negative-constructive. What do we mean: First, it negates; This means that the first one demolishes the ineffective components of the old structure and the second one modifies and builds it from “new”. on the condition that at any moment it was necessary to be able to correct it again. The rational-critical view is always being renewed.
After this theoretical discussion, it is necessary to say: basically, talking in general has no rationality. No human being and nation can manage their life affairs and solve their issues and problems by themselves. Because people and nations in communication with each other can master their needs and basically provide the possibility of living in this challenging and problematic world. If we say “we can” without rationality and logic, it seems that we have violated the principle of human and social life. You think that for thousands of years, human life has been useless, wrong, and invalid, and now we have found the most correct, best, and perfect way. Thousands of years of human life have passed and no human and no nation can live alone in these thousands of years.
Support of critical intellect to be able to condition!
They say: “When we say “we can” it means that we are not dependent on a nation or anyone. We ourselves can be a human being or a nation that others depend on us. This is exactly the problem! If we can understand that the meaning of dependence and connection is not the same and the essence of these two concepts are completely different; Then we can say: yes “we can” but on condition! “We can” does not mean that we have all the powers and we don’t need others. “We can” only do our part properly. We have ability only in the specific sector that we are in charge of, not in all sectors. This is our main claim in this paper. “We can” but only in our specialized department, not in all departments. With this condition: Yes “we can” with this condition in mind. These two claims, one we can and the other we will do our best, have a fundamental difference in development. We can, can claim to reinvent the wheel without dependence on the outside, and with a sense of isolationism, indulge in a strategy of export development rather than any import. It means creating complete independence from the world even at the cost of being isolated. But we are trying our best, it means to excel the specialized advantages in front of other countries in order to be empowered in domestic and international competition. The latter is able to transform the limited access system into an open system. Because ability comes first.
When the responsibility and commitment is on the experts and collaborators, then we don’t easily say “we can” but we say where we can and where we can’t. Because experts and associates always have doubts to properly fulfill their obligations and responsibilities. In general, it is not rational and logical for experts and colleagues to say decisively that “we can”; Rather, they say with doubts that “we will use all our efforts”.
Why does the president insist on an efficient expert system?
According to our main question: “Why does the president insist so much on employing experts and associates?” I intend to argue that “we can” is an empty and meaningless concept, but “we will do our best” is constructive, motivating and progressive.
Mr. President believes that in our country, unfortunately, not everyone has been placed in their place in every job. No one is in his own place. In other words, not only did we not have expertise in the work, but we did not try to learn or imitate in order to be able to do the accepted commitment properly. All this saying is that we must implement “we will use all our efforts”. We can show our inefficiency in the field of creating each job with one million tomans.
Therefore, the concept of “we can” has taken us away from the reality of life and wandered in the valley of illusion. why Because we want to do the specialization that we have not learned. This is a disaster. By the way, the president has well understood that we must first learn and specialize in something and then shout the claim “we can” loudly. In addition, by the way, when someone has expertise, he becomes more conservative and careful and tries to implement his expertise in the best way. That is, he wants to implement exactly “We will use all our efforts”.
But if we say from the beginning that “we can” and we don’t have any expertise in our power, without fear or doubt, we work hard and want to solve problems and issues. An expert or associate never does anything without fear and doubt. Fear and doubt make him study about that specialty first of all. Or, according to today’s sayings, first make a diagnosis, then get expert advice, and then get into the work flow. The president wants this: “Let’s do something with knowledge and study”. Of course, in order to be able to find expertise and become an expert, first of all, we need a rational-critical view of everything; Second, after acquiring rationality for that expertise and expertise, we must prepare organizations; Third, people who want to work in specialized fields must have organizational behavior and commitment; Fourth, each specialty is divided into sub-specialties, people should be divided into sub-specialties. So the verb “we can” will not be used easily.
How is development possible?
“We can” pulls us into an absurd, infinite and conflicting space from which it is really difficult and impossible to get out. Therefore, “we can” is not a positive and motivational expression and the factor of movement and development. “We use all our efforts” is a motivational concept and the factor of movement and development. I believe that accurate and correct and rational-critical concepts should be defined.
Maybe only the word “we can” is beautiful to us and how we can achieve it is not important to us. We think that just keeping the hope alive that one day we too can achieve our desires is an important work and effect. But we never examined the process of this arrival. With which objectivity and mentality can I achieve my wishes? Where is this ceiling of my desires for which I can define the concept of “arriving”?
Can we really! Have we really been able to finish a project that is beneficial to the nation and property of Iran, on time and within a specific and predetermined deadline?! Why do projects take several times the scheduled time? Maybe some friends will draw their sharp and sharp swords of criticism on me, what are you saying that we Iranians are all committed to finishing the projects on time! We Iranians have a history of such and such, and at a time when the world didn’t know what deadlines and commitment were, we Iranians had a commitment!
These are all valid arguments that everyone talks about “we were”! And the present tense verb “we are” is absent in it. We were everything in the past and we are proud of being these things. But by repeating these facts, we should not become a delusional nation. Rather, we should ask ourselves, where do we stand with this precious heritage? Why are we afraid of bitter realities and want to live with sweet memories of thousands of years ago? In the current situation, the more we stumble, the more we feel empty under our feet and we find ourselves lost in the infinite space of suffering and torment of a simple life. We call it effort. Maybe we are illusionists who either don’t know how to name or we are actually drunkards who call illusion effort.
Why do we just say we were like this?
We saw power in destroying others. We intellectuals never put ourselves in the way of trying to solve problems and achieve a goal through dialogue and cooperation. Rather, we became part of the problem. And we made the path of others more rocky. And this is the vicious circle in which we are trapped. We intellectuals consider the existence of others to be too small for us, we have never thought about the infinite space of action because we always spoke on the spot. In this sense, the atmosphere of competition has always been unequal, both in the economy and in thought! I have to be able to prove myself, but this is possible by pulling someone else down.
According to Max Weber, when there is a logical connection between the means and the goal, that demand is rational and the possibility of achieving it is possible. But which of our desires has a logical means and goal? When these two are achieved, am I the person who can make the best use of that tool? Would “we can” happen if I really wasn’t the person of the tool? It means to stay in my position in any way possible, and any bad fate that happens in that area is no longer important. It should be “I can” not “I will try my best”. And if I fail, it means that I will accept defeat, not that I will convince everyone that I will win in any way and in any case.
Since we Iranians are very skilled and trained in epic speeches, it is easy to say “we can”, but we never thought of continuing it. Because it is hard and complicated. Instead of “we can”, the world uses “we will do our best”; They talk about trying, not being able. They say I will do my best to do my job in the best possible way. I write with full confidence and record that generation Z uses this formula: it does not say “I can” but “I do my best” I will take it.” And when he can’t, he easily accepts failure and prepares himself for the next step. But my contemporaries use “I can” a lot. Even when they fail, they speak in such a way that they still win. For this reason, history has no lessons for them. For this reason, the president insists that things proceed based on expertise so that we can do all the efforts. Not the one who says we can, then neither 1 million tomans worth of jobs will be created nor will the promised 4 million housing units be delivered to the people on the basis of we can.
Sources:
1. Rosides and…; moral conditions of economic growth; Translated by Ahmed Tedin and Shaheen Ahmadi; Hermes Publications; First edition 2001.
2. Boudon, Raymond; social logic, the method of analyzing social issues; Translated by Abdul Hossein Nikgahar; Javidan Publications; Second edition 1370
3. A group of writers; Government, corruption and social opportunities, the interaction of ideas in the political economy of development; Translated by Hossein Raghofer; Naqsh and Negar Publications; First edition, 2002.
Read more:
The gloomy outlook of the environment / We need an environmental revolution
Baudrillard: Like a patient with AIDS, we are all immunocompromised / American and European societies are broken, viral and cancerous
Environment has no place in the 7th development plan / How did Iran fall from 53rd to 133rd place? / Why are Iranians not forward-looking?
216216
منبع: www.khabaronline.ir
